Reading The Sustainability
of Cotton brought to my attention many pressing issues that cotton
producers experience, as well as what the environment experiences. Some of the
issues mentioned include irrigation, fertilizers, pesticides, pests and
diseases, and human impact. All of which,
if taken into consideration, make a significant difference between conventional
and organic cotton growing methods. One issue that I found myself wanting to
know more about was irrigated cotton cultivation. I was shocked to read about
how much water is required for the farming and processing of cotton. According
to the reading, it takes 10,000-17,000 liters of water to produce 1 kilogram of
cotton lint. To put it into perspective, that is equal to 2,642 gallons, which
is enough to fill close to 30 standard-sized bathtubs of water! (answers.com;
answers.yahoo.com). In order for irrigation to be applied, many environmental
sacrifices have to be made. This includes diverting rivers, constructing dams,
and pumping water up from the soil. While there are prospective innovations to
more efficient irrigating techniques, the high investment costs bring cotton
producers to a halt. In order to avoid spending a fortune and sacrificing
higher profits, farmers have to pay attention to the quality and quantity of
the water being used, and be more efficient overall as much as possible.
The Cotton, Inc. website did a great job in lifting my
spirits and informing me of the current conservation methods being enforced
today. The video “Cotton & Water: White, Blue and Green” pointed out that apparently,
there is a recent “spark” being seen within cotton farmers as they are being
driven to find creative ways to conserve their water usage. In another video titled
“Protecting and Preserving Soil with Today’s Cotton-Growing Techniques”, I learned
about a new “conservation tillage” technology where instead of consistently plowing
the farm fields, no tilling is involved and a new residue is planted. This new
residue has many benefits not only in water conservation, but in reducing soil
erosion as well. It makes more water available for plants because of its
ability to soak up the rainfall and spread it more efficiently across the
crops. It would be great if these conservation methods showed successful
results, but it is ultimately up to the farmer as to whether or not they will
be practiced.
The valuable information presented in the reading and the short
videos led me to form the opinion that the current cultivation methods of
cotton are not sustainable at all. However, I do see definite potential in the
future for sustainability to be better enforced. This will ONLY occur if the
more efficient methods are actually adopted and correctly performed by farmers.
Consumers can also take part in this effort by being more aware of the
production history of the garments that they purchase. So in conclusion, your
t-shirt isn’t basic at all! However, the required steps to be more sustainable
in producing your t-shirt CAN become basic and simple if we choose to exert the
needed effort.
Hey, Mallory! Great blog this week. You have a strong thesis statement and great organization of your ideas. Your points are made very clearly. What are your thoughts about the scale of cotton production, sustainable or not? Can we continue to grow this crop in the amounts we grow it?
ReplyDeleteDr. Armstrong,
DeleteCotton production on an overall scale in my opinion, seems to be not very sustainable. However based on some upcoming improvements such as those mentioned in the readings and online, I believe that there is a chance for cotton production to become more sustainable. Hopefully these new production methods will be adopted so much that the old methods become nonexistant!
As far as the amount that is being grown, I think that we definitely can continue to grow this crop in the massive amounts that we do. But we risk a significant amount of turmoil on our environment if we choose to do so. In the end, it is all up to us. Thanks for the feedback!
Mallory,
ReplyDeleteGreat job this week! I could tell from your writing that you used the readings and website information to positively support cotton production. You mention that your spirits were lifted after navigating the Cotton, Inc. website, do you think their information could have been skewed? In other words, since they are a producer of cotton products do you feel as though they want to make their audience view these practices as positive ones? Thus, the (face value) information they share with the general public is one with a happy ending instead of some of the harsher truths.
Kimberly,
DeleteI definitely think that information mentioned on the Cotton, Inc. website could be skewed toward a more positive light than what is reality. However, I do think that some of the more sustainable methods that they discussed are valid. My spirits were lifted in the sense that they were recongnizing that adjustments needed to be made, and they were taking the time to investigate some changes. I noticed how the reading gave us insight into the harsher truths, while the website was the opposite. Whichever is true or false, at least more sustainability efforts are being experimented with!
Mallory,
ReplyDeleteI like your positive outlook! I am glad that at least some of the population are making strides in the right direction!